At a glance
- U.S. rank 2025
- Not in the 2025 data · last seen 1956 (#5,325)
- Babies in 1956
- 6 (<0.01% of girls)
- Peak
- #738 in 1880
- First recorded
- 1880
Meaning of Eola
Eola, pronounced EE-oh-luh (/iːˈoʊlə/), presents an elegant compression of vowels that rolls off the tongue with measured grace. Though its precise lineage remains elusive, etymologists often trace it to the Irish Gaelic eolas, denoting “knowledge,” while others detect a classical shimmer evocative of Eos, the Greek goddess of dawn—suggesting both sagacity and renewal. In early 20th-century Louisiana naming charts, Eola carved out a modest niche: nineteen newborn bearers in 1922 secured its peak ranking at 119, with surrounding years recording between five and nine occurrences. In a region celebrated for jazz and jambalaya, Eola preferred a whisper to a brass band—never quite storming the top 100, yet affirming that subtlety can confer its own distinction. Today, its rarity imparts an air of curated singularity, making Eola an alluring choice for parents drawn to names that balance historical resonance with modern elegance.
How to pronounce Eola
English
- Pronounced EE-oh-luh /iːˈoʊlə/
Popularity of Eola in the U.S.
Eola was last recorded in the U.S. in 1956, ranked #5,325 with 6 babies. It peaked at #738 in 1880.
- Rank among U.S. girl names (right scale, #1 at the top)
Year-by-year table, 1880–1956 59 rows
| Year | Babies | Rank | vs previous year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1956 | 6 | 5,325 | back (not recorded in 1955) |
| 1954 | 5 | 5,753 | back (not recorded in 1950–1953) |
| 1949 | 6 | 4,673 | ▼ 22 |
| 1948 | 6 | 4,651 | ▼ 306 |
| 1947 | 7 | 4,345 | ▲ 72 |
| 1946 | 6 | 4,417 | ▲ 139 |
| 1945 | 5 | 4,556 | back (not recorded in 1944) |
| 1943 | 9 | 3,249 | ▼ 55 |
| 1942 | 9 | 3,194 | ▲ 58 |
| 1941 | 8 | 3,252 | ▲ 1,097 |
| 1940 | 5 | 4,349 | ▼ 1,427 |
| 1939 | 9 | 2,922 | ▼ 582 |
| 1938 | 13 | 2,340 | ▼ 23 |
| 1937 | 13 | 2,317 | back (not recorded in 1936) |
| 1935 | 10 | 2,731 | ▼ 307 |
| 1934 | 12 | 2,424 | ▲ 264 |
| 1933 | 10 | 2,688 | ▲ 143 |
| 1932 | 10 | 2,831 | ▼ 81 |
| 1931 | 10 | 2,750 | ▼ 640 |
| 1930 | 16 | 2,110 | ▲ 81 |
| 1929 | 15 | 2,191 | ▼ 168 |
| 1928 | 18 | 2,023 | ▲ 836 |
| 1927 | 11 | 2,859 | ▼ 694 |
| 1926 | 17 | 2,165 | ▼ 518 |
| 1925 | 26 | 1,647 | ▲ 415 |
| 1924 | 19 | 2,062 | ▼ 118 |
| 1923 | 20 | 1,944 | ▼ 659 |
| 1922 | 37 | 1,285 | ▲ 480 |
| 1921 | 24 | 1,765 | ▲ 124 |
| 1920 | 21 | 1,889 | ▼ 362 |
| 1919 | 27 | 1,527 | ▲ 227 |
| 1918 | 22 | 1,754 | ▲ 93 |
| 1917 | 19 | 1,847 | ▼ 402 |
| 1916 | 26 | 1,445 | ▲ 177 |
| 1915 | 21 | 1,622 | ▼ 237 |
| 1914 | 21 | 1,385 | ▼ 345 |
| 1913 | 27 | 1,040 | ▲ 437 |
| 1912 | 14 | 1,477 | ▼ 27 |
| 1911 | 11 | 1,450 | ▼ 29 |
| 1910 | 11 | 1,421 | ▲ 50 |
| 1909 | 9 | 1,471 | ▲ 391 |
| 1908 | 6 | 1,862 | ▼ 350 |
| 1907 | 8 | 1,512 | ▲ 41 |
| 1906 | 7 | 1,553 | ▼ 460 |
| 1905 | 12 | 1,093 | ▲ 393 |
| 1904 | 7 | 1,486 | ▼ 517 |
| 1903 | 13 | 969 | ▲ 164 |
| 1902 | 10 | 1,133 | back (not recorded in 1901) |
| 1900 | 6 | 1,723 | ▼ 788 |
| 1899 | 12 | 935 | ▲ 567 |
| 1898 | 6 | 1,502 | ▼ 335 |
| 1897 | 8 | 1,167 | ▲ 249 |
| 1896 | 6 | 1,416 | back (not recorded in 1895) |
| 1894 | 9 | 1,061 | ▲ 30 |
| 1893 | 8 | 1,091 | ▼ 261 |
| 1892 | 13 | 830 | ▲ 383 |
| 1891 | 6 | 1,213 | ▼ 3 |
| 1890 | 6 | 1,210 | back (not recorded in 1881–1889) |
| 1880 | 6 | 738 | – |